The Kennedys – America's "Royal" Families

The video, "The Kennedys – America's "Royal" Families," chronicles the rise and tragedies of the Kennedy dynasty, tracing their journey from Irish immigrants to prominent figures in American politics and society (0:35).

Key aspects of the Kennedy family discussed include:

Early Generations (1:20-2:25): The video begins with Patrick Kennedy's emigration from Ireland, detailing his and his son PJ Kennedy's efforts to establish the family's wealth and political influence in Boston.

Joseph P. Kennedy Sr. and Rose Fitzgerald (2:44-5:55): This section highlights Joseph P. Kennedy Sr.'s shrewd financial dealings, his ambitions for his children, and his controversial diplomatic career as ambassador to the UK. It also touches upon Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy's role as the matriarch.

John F. Kennedy (JFK) (5:56-12:46): The video details JFK's military service, his political ascent to the presidency, his marriage to Jacqueline Bouvier, and his major policy decisions, including the Cuban Missile Crisis (10:16). His assassination in Dallas is also covered (11:38).

Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis (12:46-14:17): After JFK's death, Jackie's life, including her move to New York, her work as a book editor, and her later marriage to Aristotle Onassis, is summarized.

Caroline and John F. Kennedy Jr. (14:18-16:01): The video discusses the lives of JFK's children, Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg's career as an ambassador, and John F. Kennedy Jr.'s life, including his tragic death in a plane crash.

Other Kennedy Siblings and Their Descendants:

Rosemary Kennedy (17:35-19:31): Her developmental challenges and the controversial lobotomy she underwent are discussed, highlighting the family's attempts to keep her condition private.

Kathleen "Kick" Kennedy (19:31-21:05): Her lively personality, marriage to a British aristocrat, and her own tragic death in a plane crash are recounted.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver (21:05-22:42): Her advocacy for people with disabilities and her founding of the Special Olympics are emphasized. Her daughter, Maria Shriver, and her marriage to Arnold Schwarzenegger are also mentioned.

Patricia Kennedy Lawford (22:42-24:02): Her artistic pursuits, marriage to actor Peter Lawford, and her later work with charitable organizations are covered.

Robert "Bobby" Kennedy (RFK) (24:02-26:05): His political career, role in his brother's administration, and his own assassination during his presidential campaign are detailed. His wife, Ethel Kennedy, and their children are also introduced (26:05).

Jean Kennedy Smith (27:37-28:47): Her diplomatic role as ambassador to Ireland and her work with the Very Special Arts organization are highlighted.

Edward "Ted" Kennedy (28:48-31:29): As the youngest sibling, his long tenure in the Senate, his legislative achievements, and the challenges he faced, including the Chappaquiddick incident, are discussed.

The video concludes by posing the question of whether the numerous tragedies that have befallen the Kennedys are simply due to their ambitious and risk-taking nature or if there is a "Kennedy curse" (31:30).

The Epstein files cover-up: Botched or calculated? | The Listening Post

This video from Al Jazeera's The Listening Post covers three main topics: the Epstein files, the internet crackdown in Iran, and the militarization of American football through the Super Bowl.

The first segment focuses on the Epstein files (0:43) and the alleged cover-up by the US Department of Justice.

The video highlights the disorderly release of over 3 million documents, 180,000 images, and 2,000 videos (0:43-0:52).

It discusses the failed redaction of names of high-profile suspects and the accidental exposure of victims' identities (1:02-1:06).

The segment emphasizes the lack of accountability in the US, particularly concerning Donald Trump's name appearing frequently in the files (1:31-1:38).

 Accountability in the U.S. fails due to several factors:

Lack of Action Despite Evidence: Despite the release of the Epstein files and awareness of what happened, no one is facing accountability (2:47-2:51).

Media Complicity: The media is seen as complicit because it is not asking key questions about the unredacted parts of the files (2:52-2:57).

Politicization of Justice: The Department of Justice (DOJ) is described as essentially serving as "Trump's personal law firm" rather than representing the American people's interests (4:06-4:14). This suggests a breakdown in the impartiality of the justice system.

Calculated Strategy: The release of the files is seen by some as a "calculated move" to "muddy the waters" and solely blame the deceased Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, rather than the wider network (3:00-3:08, 4:37-4:55).

Political Party Loyalty: Unlike in the past (e.g., Watergate), Republicans are no longer willing to stand up to a Republican president, backing "every move that he does" regardless of scandal (8:09-8:31). This prevents accountability from within the political system.

Gaslighting through Media Apparatus: The video claims a "media apparatus" is dedicated to "gaslighting millions of people each and every day to believe that he did absolutely nothing wrong" (8:41-8:50), making it difficult for the public to demand accountability.

Deep Societal Rot: The speaker expresses concern that "pedophilia is no longer a bipartisan issue" and that the "rot inside of this country is so incredibly deep," making it difficult to mend the "deep fracture" in the justice system (9:04-9:18:49).

Unwillingness of US Government to Pursue Justice: It is stated that the U.S. will most definitely not get accountability, and other governments abroad are encouraged to pursue it instead (9:52-9:55).

Experts in the video suggest the release was a calculated move to muddy the waters and pin the syndicate on Epstein alone (3:00-3:08, 4:37-4:55).

The role of social media and crowd-sourcing in scrutinizing the files is also discussed (10:10-10:26).

The second segment covers the internet blackout in Iran (11:31) and the repression of journalists.

Iranian authorities imposed a total internet blackout during anti-government protests, leading to a renewed wave of repression against journalists and political figures (11:31-11:47).

The video notes the difficulties journalists face in reporting and the punitive measures taken against them (11:53-12:23).

It suggests that Chinese technology from companies like Huawei and Hikvision may be aiding Iran in its internet filtering and surveillance capabilities (13:05-13:34).

The final segment examines the militarization of American football and the Super Bowl (14:12).

The Super Bowl is presented as a spectacle where militarism is aggressively marketed, from choreographed flyovers to flags (14:15-14:23).

The deep-rooted relationship between the NFL and the military is explored, with football's language often mirroring war analogies (15:58-16:13).

The segment highlights the mutual benefits of this relationship, allowing the military to showcase hardware, recruit soldiers, and reinforce narratives (16:49-16:57).

The "paid patriotism" scandal of 2015 is mentioned, where taxpayer funds were used to stage military displays during games (19:07-19:22).

The segment concludes by asserting that these events present a sanitized version of military service, allowing Americans to feel patriotic without confronting the harsh realities of war (22:46-23:07).

Horrors of the Dark Web

This video, "Horrors of the Dark Web," by Snook (0:00), explores two disturbing stories related to the dark web: "Boytown," an illicit online community, and the "WannaCry ransomware attack," a global cyberattack.

Boytown: A Horrific Online Community (0:47)

Launch and Purpose (1:36): Launched in June 2019, Boytown was a German video-sharing platform on the Tor browser, hosting illegal content involving minors and encouraging original uploads.

Community and Organization (2:47): It functioned as a hidden community with chat rooms (Loli Pub and Boys Pub) where users shared content and indulged in fantasies. The site evolved, with administrators organizing content into categories like "Art," "Kindergarten," and "Toddler" (4:29).

Scale and Operations (6:21): By May 2021, Boytown had 400,000 registered users, producing and distributing illegal content. Administrators also provided users with tips to avoid law enforcement (5:57).

Investigation and Arrests (7:15): German police and Interpol infiltrated the site, tracking down four administrators through their "entry nodes" on the Tor network (8:51). These individuals were arrested in April 2021 (10:27).

Controversy and Cover-up Allegations (10:49): The trial was closed to the public, unlike similar cases, raising suspicions that a high-ranking German security agency employee, allegedly involved in creating Boytown's security, was being protected (12:48).

Post-Shutdown Resurgence and Deletion Efforts (15:38): After the shutdown, a dump of Boytown's data reappeared online because the German government did not wipe the information. A group of journalists from Funk, specifically the YouTube channel STRG_F, heroically deleted 13.5 terabytes of data across various file-hosting sites (16:48). Despite efforts, successor websites emerged, proving the persistent nature of such communities (17:46).

WannaCry Ransomware Attacks (20:26)

NSA Exploit and Shadow Brokers (20:44): In August 2016, a group known as the "Shadow Brokers" allegedly stole advanced surveillance tools from the NSA, including "EternalBlue" and "DoublePulsar" (22:51). These powerful tools could grant remote access and control over Windows computers (25:51).

Leak and Ransomware Development (25:35): After failing to auction the stolen code, the Shadow Brokers released it onto the dark web in April 2017. Another group of hackers used these tools to develop "WannaCry," a ransomware designed to encrypt computers and demand a $300 Bitcoin payment (29:31).

Global Impact (31:30): On May 12, 2017, WannaCry was released, rapidly spreading worldwide. It crippled hospitals in the UK (31:47), public transportation in Germany (33:33), and industries in China (34:11), affecting over 150 countries and 230,000 computers within 48 hours (34:53).

The Kill Switch (35:12): A 22-year-old cybersecurity researcher, Marcus Hutchins, discovered a "kill switch" in the WannaCry code—a random domain it attempted to connect to. By registering this domain for $9.99, he inadvertently halted the ransomware's spread (35:38).

Aftermath and Attribution (36:48): WannaCry caused an estimated $4 billion in damages globally. Investigations linked the attack to the "Lazarus Group," a state-sponsored organization in North Korea responsible for numerous high-profile cyberattacks (37:41). The North Korean government has never accepted responsibility (38:13).

Maktoums - Trillionaire Family That Built Dubai | 2025 Documentary

The video presents a detailed history of Dubai and the Al Maktoum family, tracing their journey from a small fishing village to a global metropolis. 

It emphasizes that Dubai's success is not primarily due to oil, but rather a combination of strategic leadership, ambition, and entrepreneurial spirit (0:01).

 Here's a breakdown of the key periods and transformations: 

 Humble Beginnings and Early Leadership (0:43-6:12): The family's connection to Dubai began in 1833 when two cousins, Obed bin Sed and Maktum Bimbuti, led their people north after a massacre and settled by a small creek, a place that soon became known as Dubai (3:16 - 4:03). The video describes them as a family "defined by ruthless ambition and surgical efficiency" (0:27). 

Throughout history, their leaders, such as Shikh Maktoum bin Hasher al-Maktum (6:21), Shikh Rashid bin Sahed al-Maktum (16:32), and Shikh Muhammad bin Rashid al-Maktum (28:40), have been instrumental in transforming Dubai from a humble fishing village into a global force (0:09 - 0:14). The video emphasizes that their leadership, characterized by "discipline and bold risk-taking," has been the secret to Dubai's enduring success (37:40 - 38:07). 

Dubai started as a nameless fishing village (0:48) settled by the Al Bu Falasa branch of the Bani Yas tribe after a massacre in Leewa in 1833 (2:47-3:06). Under the early Maktum rulers, the settlement gained security through the General Maritime Treaty with Britain in 1820 (5:26). 

The Freeport Revolution (6:16-9:07): Shikh Maktoum bin Hasher al-Maktoum (6:21) implemented a bold policy in 1894, abolishing customs duties (7:41), which attracted traders and migrants, especially from Persia (8:40), turning Dubai into a magnet for commerce (7:58). 

Pearling Boom and Collapse (9:10-12:15): The pearl industry became the backbone of Dubai's economy in the early 1900s (10:17). However, the introduction of cultured pearls from Japan by Koki Mikimoto (10:49) caused the natural pearl market to collapse (11:32), devastating Dubai's economy. Stagnation and the Search for Oil (12:24-16:27): The collapse of pearling led to economic ruin and political unrest, including a second massacre in 1939 (14:14). Despite the discovery of oil in neighboring regions (15:04), Dubai's early oil exploration attempts failed (15:53). 

Rashid's Vision and Infrastructure Development (16:32-26:58): Shikh Rashid bin Sahed al-Maktoum (16:32) took power in 1958 and initiated the dredging of the Dubai Creek (18:05), revitalizing trade. The discovery of offshore oil in 1966 (24:19) provided the necessary funds for massive infrastructure projects like Port Rashid (25:35), the World Trade Center (25:54), and Jebel Ali Port (26:27), transforming Dubai into a major shipping center.

 Formation of the UAE and the Gold Trade (19:10-23:02): The video highlights Dubai's role in the formation of the United Arab Emirates in 1971 (23:02) following Britain's withdrawal from the region (21:33). During this period, Dubai also became a secret hub for gold smuggling to India (19:57), earning it the moniker "City of Gold" (27:00). 

Diversification and Global Ambition (28:35-31:14): With flattening oil revenues, Shikh Muhammad bin Rashid al-Maktoum (28:40) spearheaded the creation of the Jebel Ali Free Zone in 1985 (29:11), attracting foreign investment by offering tax-free operations and full ownership. 

The Boom and Financial Crisis (31:23-35:54): Under Shikh Muhammad, Dubai embarked on ambitious projects like Burj al Arab (32:10), Palm Jumeirah (32:25), and the Burj Khalifa (32:42), fueled by massive debt (33:01). The 2008 global financial crisis (33:50) hit Dubai hard, leading to a debt crisis for Dubai World (34:00) that was eventually resolved by a $10 billion bailout from Abu Dhabi (35:05). Recovery and Future Plans (35:59-38:07): After the crisis, Dubai initiated the Dubai 2040 urban master plan (36:25) to further global relevance. The video concludes by emphasizing that Dubai's enduring success is attributed to its strategic leadership and continuous reinvention, with oil now contributing less than 1% of its GDP (37:17).

Why Owning Nothing Is So Expensive

The video explains how companies are increasingly shifting towards subscription models, making it more expensive for consumers to access products and services they once owned outright (0:55). This trend, exemplified by companies like HP, Adobe, and Apple, generates recurring revenue for businesses and makes it difficult for consumers to cancel services due to "dark patterns" and hidden fees (6:26).

Key points highlighted in the video:

• The rise of subscriptions (1:58): The video traces the evolution of subscriptions from traditional print media and milk deliveries to modern digital services like Netflix and Spotify, enabled by technology like cable TV and smartphones.
• Company benefits from subscriptions (6:26): Subscriptions provide companies with stable, recurring revenue and are "sticky," meaning users are less likely to cancel due to automatic payments and difficult cancellation processes.
• Sneaky tactics and difficult cancellations (9:13): Companies often use free trials or misleading pricing to entice users, and then employ "dark patterns" (10:34) to make it hard to unsubscribe, leading to consumers paying more than they initially intended.
• The "own nothing" economy (13:39): The proliferation of subscriptions blurs the line between owning and accessing, as products like printers and cars increasingly limit features behind subscriptions, giving consumers less control over their purchases.
• Consumer resistance and the future (16:52): Some consumers are fighting back by embracing physical media like vinyl records and supporting companies that offer one-time purchases. However, the video concludes that the "own nothing" economy is likely to persist unless regulations are put in place to protect consumers from deceptive subscription practices.

• The video explains that companies are incentivized to use subscription models primarily because they provide recurring revenue, which is highly valued by investors (6:36).

  Additionally, the video highlights that subscriptions are "sticky," meaning they are effective at retaining users because payments are often automatic. Consumers are four times more likely to cancel if they have to make an active choice (6:41). This model allows companies to earn significantly more money—up to 200% more revenue—from "inattentive subscribers" than they would with more transparent pricing schemes (6:53). The industry has recognized this as a profitable business model and is adopting it to maximize profits (7:06).

The Olympics Make Billions…But The Athletes Are Broke

The video explains the complex financial model of the Olympics, highlighting how the International Olympic Committee (IOC) generates billions in revenue while host cities often face bankruptcy and most athletes struggle financially (0:00).

IOC Revenue Streams

• The IOC made $7.7 billion from 2021 to 2024 (0:36).
• Broadcast rights account for 55% of revenue, with NBC in the Americas being a major contributor (1:13).
• Sponsorships through the Olympic Partners (TOP) Program make up 36% of revenue (2:51). However, some long-term sponsors, like Toyota, have withdrawn due to concerns about the IOC's political stance and its distribution of funds (2:25).
• The remaining 9% comes from other activities like licensing deals (3:03).

Host Cities and Financial Struggles

• Host cities are primarily responsible for the non-OCOG budget, which covers construction and capital investments, leading to significant cost overruns (6:41).
• Since 1960, every Olympic Games has gone over budget, with an average overrun of 150% to 175% (7:14). Montreal in 1976 was 720% over budget, taking 30 years to pay off its debt (7:36).
• Host cities often incur massive expenses for "white elephant" structures like stadiums and train lines that are rarely used after the games (9:41).
• The financial burden largely falls on taxpayers (10:10).
• In 2019, the IOC changed its bidding process due to fewer cities wanting to host, aiming for a more financially stable approach (5:18). Paris 2024 aimed to mitigate costs by using 95% pre-existing or temporary venues and had established transportation (14:53).

Athlete Financial Instability

• Despite the billions in revenue, less than 6% of the IOC's revenue goes directly to athletes (10:50).
• The average US Olympian earns around $20,000 per year, often requiring them to work part-time jobs (10:55).

• Olympic athletes primarily fund their participation through a combination of sources, as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) does not directly pay them for competing (12:21-12:24, https://www.olympics.com/ioc/finance. The funding typically covers their extensive training, equipment, coaching, travel, and living expenses.

  Here's how athletes typically secure funding:

  • Stipends from Sporting Bodies Athletes may receive monthly payments from their sport's governing body, such as USA Track and Field. These stipends vary significantly by sport and are often based on an athlete's experience, past performance, and potential to win medals. For example, athletes in popular sports like gymnastics, swimming, or track might receive a few thousand dollars per month, while those in less prominent sports like fencing or rowing might only get a couple of hundred dollars (11:49-12:13).
  • Prize Money from Home Countries The IOC does not offer prize money for winning medals (12:21-12:24). Instead, any monetary reward for medals comes from the athlete's home country. The amount varies widely; for instance, Singapore and Hong Kong might pay over $700,000 for a gold medal, while the US pays $38,000, and Great Britain offers no prize money (12:27-12:38).
  • Sponsorships and Endorsements This is a significant source of income for many athletes, particularly those with high visibility. Major stars like Simone Biles, Michael Phelps, and Usain Bolt can earn millions annually through sponsorships (12:44-12:59). However, sponsorship deals depend on an athlete's popularity, performance, and ability to generate a return on investment for brands. Less famous athletes, even if they are top in their field, often struggle to find sponsorships (13:00-13:23, https://www.investopedia.com/news/how-athletes-get-funding-olympics/.
  • Personal Contributions and Fundraising Because the funding from other sources is often insufficient, many Olympians hold one or two part-time jobs while training (11:11-11:17, https://www.si.com/winter-olympics/what-do-olympic-medalists-get-medals-money-rewards. The video highlights that many athletes even have to fundraise within their communities to cover the cost of traveling to the Olympics (13:31-13:35).
  • Olympic Solidarity Grants The IOC redistributes a portion of its revenue to National Olympic Committees (NOCs) to support athlete development, training grants, and travel subsidies, especially for athletes from developing nations.
  • Private Donations In recent developments, private donations have begun to offer more direct financial stability to athletes. For example, a recent $100 million donation is set to provide Team USA athletes with $200,000 each starting in 2026, regardless of medal wins.

  Overall, while the Olympic movement generates billions, a very small percentage of the IOC's revenue (less than 6%) directly reaches the athletes (10:50-10:55), making financial stability a significant challenge for most Olympians.

• Only major stars like Simone Biles and Michael Phelps secure lucrative sponsorship deals (12:52). Most athletes struggle to find sponsorships and often have to fundraise to cover travel expenses (13:31).

The video concludes by questioning where the money goes, suggesting that the IOC takes no risk while cities and taxpayers bear the financial burden, and the athletes, who make the show possible, receive very little (13:53). The directors of the IOC, however, take home a combined $50 million (14:35). A long-term solution proposed by some analysts is to have permanent host cities for the Summer and Winter Games (15:23).

I watched Melania's movie so you don't have to.

This video offers a critical review of the Melania Trump movie, exploring Melania's public persona, her role as First Lady, and the perceptions surrounding her.

Here's a breakdown of the video's key points:

• The Melania Movie (0:10-2:24): The creator discusses watching the Melania movie, noting its direction by Brett Ratner, who was pushed out of Hollywood due to Me Too accusations. The film's rights were acquired by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos for $40 million. Despite the movie's intent to provide insight into Melania, the creator found it boring and felt it failed to reveal her true personality.
• Melania's Persona and Ambitions (2:44-3:43): The video highlights a promotional image of Melania that strikingly resembles Claire Underwood from House of Cards, and an old ad showing Melania as a "gobos" (boss) and President of the United States. These images contradict her public reputation as a submissive wife, suggesting her ambitions are more complex than commonly perceived.
• Early Life and Modeling Career (3:55-7:10): Melania Kavs was born in Slovenia in 1970. She started modeling as a teenager, leaving university to pursue it full-time. She worked in European fashion markets before moving to New York in 1996. The video discusses a controversial nude photoshoot she did for free with photographer Alexander Basville, which later resurfaced during her husband's presidential campaign.
• Relationship with Donald Trump and First Lady Role (7:12-11:47): Melania met Donald Trump in 1998 and they married in 2005. Her public profile rose significantly with Trump's 2015 presidential run. The video touches on reports that she cried upon learning Trump would become president and the controversy surrounding her 2016 Republican National Convention speech, which plagiarized parts of Michelle Obama's 2008 speech. The creator questions the actual purpose and influence of the First Lady role, referencing journalist Katy Martin's views that a First Lady's intelligence and engagement are crucial.
• Symbolism and Public Perception (12:11-15:20): The video notes Melania's strategic use of fashion, particularly her outfit at Trump's first inauguration, which echoed Jackie Kennedy's style to signal her fitness for the role. Her later 2024 inauguration outfit, with a black hat covering her eyes, was interpreted as a statement of setting her own terms and creating distance from her role and husband. The movie is criticized for focusing on her modeling experience and outfits rather than her stated desire to push the First Lady role beyond social duties.
• "Be Best" Campaign and Public Backlash (16:50-17:52): Melania's "Be Best" anti-bullying campaign launched in 2018 is discussed, highlighting the irony when her husband publicly mocked a 16-year-old climate activist. This led to public backlash and questions about the sincerity of her initiative, as she did not publicly scold him.
• Marital Speculation and Comparisons to Other Political Spouses (19:17-23:50): The video addresses the ongoing speculation about Melania's relationship with Donald Trump, especially after instances like the "hat incident" where she seemingly avoided his kiss. The creator explores two comparative stories of European political wives: Veronica Lario (ex-wife of Berlusconi), who divorced him due to his public behavior, and Carla Bruni (wife of Nicolas Sarkozy), who stayed by her husband's side despite corruption investigations. The creator concludes that the film doesn't question Melania's loyalty, suggesting she genuinely likes him and finds comfort in her wealthy life as First Lady.
• Final Critique of the Film (24:14-25:01): A Guardian critic is quoted, describing the film as having "not a single redeeming quality," a "designer taxidermy," and a "gilded trash remake" that distracts viewers while her husband and his cronies dismantle the constitution.

 

Why the US is almost always at war | DW Documentary

The video, "Why the US is almost always at war," explores the historical role of warfare in shaping American identity and political decisions throughout its 250-year existence (1:27). The United States has been almost constantly at war since its foundation (1:06-1:09).

Key aspects of the video include:

• Military Presence and Identity (0:38-1:10): The US military showcases its power globally, with hundreds of thousands of troops on continuous deployment. War has played a central role in shaping the nation's political course, and battle reenactments, memorials, museums, and uniformed ceremonies contribute to making war a key pillar of national identity.
• The Influence of War Movies (5:35-8:35): Hollywood war movies have been an effective method for anchoring military might in the population's hearts and minds. During World War II, dedicated motion picture units collaborated with the military, and prominent directors like George Stevens and John Ford participated in making films that showcased US dominance. These films encouraged patriotism and portrayed the US fighting for the "greater good."
• World Wars and Global Superpower Status (10:40-11:21): The World Wars transformed the United States from a regional power into a global superpower, dictating the new world order. World War II is particularly remembered as a war the US can "still get behind" due to the direct attack on the United States.
• US Military Infrastructure and Global Commitment (18:31-19:15): The US maintains a significant global military presence, with over 200,000 personnel stationed abroad at hundreds of bases. It possesses the most aircraft carriers and military aircraft globally, along with thousands of nuclear warheads.
• Historical Expansion and "Manifest Destiny" (51:49-56:00): The video highlights early US expansion, including the Louisiana Purchase and the acquisition of Florida and Oregon. The conquest of the West, particularly the Texas Revolution and the Battle of the Alamo, is presented as a key phase, though the narrative often overlooks the motivations of settlers to reintroduce slavery. The concept of "manifest destiny" was invented by media and politicians to justify the nation's expansion, using religion to frame it as a divine mission.
• The Impact of the Vietnam War (1:09:54-1:13:00): The Vietnam War marked a turning point, making the public question the US role as the "good guys." It was the first war shown on TV nightly, leading to a mass cultural counter-movement and the end of conscription, breaking the link between the military, politics, and society.
• "Endless Wars" and Foreign Policy Shifts (1:14:14-1:21:20): Interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq are described as "endless wars," difficult to win and end, suggesting the nation hadn't learned from past mistakes. The video discusses the current pendulum swing in US foreign policy, between isolationism and global interventionism.
• Donald Trump's Vision (1:21:39-1:24:20): Donald Trump's approach, similar to President McKinley, emphasizes American supremacy, primarily for economic interests. He aims to replace the old world order with a new system of American power, focusing on defeating enemies and ending wars.

Suddenly a millionaire : The curse of winning the lottery

Where Did Jeffrey Epstein’s Money Come From?

Why the West Wanted Venezuela Destroyed | A History Documentary

The Dark Web | Black Market Trade | Cyber Crime | Crime | Alpha Bay

Money Rituals: Africa’s Deadliest Taboo - BBC Africa Eye Documentary

The Scandals That Still Haunt Billionaire Dynasties (Documentary)

John D. Rockefeller: The Man Who Created The System You Can Never Escape

Birthgap

Possibly the Biggest Scam in Hip Hop History...

Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit against BBC as bosses resign

The $47 Billion Cult

The Hilton Curse: From Hotel Empire to Paris, Scandals, and Forgotten Heirs